Why do std::shared_ptr and std::unique_ptr have different template parameters?

Interesting question on StackOverflow – Why does unique_ptr take two template parameters when shared_ptr only takes one?

I haven’t used std::unique_ptr much and wasn’t aware that you could supply a custom deletor.

If you provide the deleter as template argument (as in unique_ptr) it is part of the type and you don’t need to store anything additional in the objects of this type. If deleter is passed as constructor’s argument (as in shared_ptr) you need to store it in the object. This is the cost of additional flexibility, since you can use different deleters for the objects of the same type

Since unique_ptr is lightweight and doesn’t have the overhead of a control block, it uses a template parameter for the deletor. std::shared_ptr takes the other choice since it already has a control block and gains the extra flexibility.

Leave a comment

Filed under C++, Programming

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s